The article analyses the views of emigre scholars (J. Bojko-Blochyn M. Hlobenko,
I. Kaczurowskyj,) of the specified period on the oeuvre of Lesya Ukrainka in its
interconnections with world literature. The results of comparative analysis of works
of the woman writer and the best representatives of European literature, from the
perspective of her searches for style, allowed the scholars to acknowledge clear
tendencies of modernism in national literature of the early 20th century, with
emphasis on its specifics, and to introduce artistic heritage of the authoress of “The
Stone Host” as a deeply original artistic phenomenon of the world culture.
Fundamental importance of the researchers’ publications dedicated to the study of
Lesya Ukrainka’s creative work – phenomenon of interpenetration of the national and
the universal, Own and Alien – in shaping of Ukrainian literature as an organic
component of the European cultural universe is emphasized.
The conclusion about multi-vector comprehension of the writer’s heritage
in comparative models of the researchers (with the focus on the problems of typology
and contact and genetic affinity, as well as involvement of interdisciplinary,
intermedial, contextual and other approaches) is substantiated, and it demonstrates
convincingly functional features of methodological tools of comparative literature in
the study of national literature in general. It is proved that concepts of the emigre
literary critics, who actually ensured continuous development of Ukrainian
comparative studies, remain relevant to this day.
Keywords: comparative studies, national literature, style, typology, contact and
genetic affinity, reception, European context,national specifics.
Files to Download
Download DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6346.2(61).165-183
References
1. Boiko Yu. Estetychni pohliady Lesi Ukrainky ta yii stylovi shukannia / Yu. Boiko
// Vybrane. – Miunkhen, 1981. – T. 3. – S. 241–286.
2. Boiko Yu. "Kaminnyi hospodar" Lesi Ukrainky / Yu. Boiko // Vybrane. –
Miunkhen, 1981. – T. 3. – S. 327–362 (S. 345).
3. Boiko Yu. Ukrainskyi romantyzm Tsentralnoi i Skhidnoi Ukrainy u yoho
stosunku do zakhidnoievropeiskoi romantyky / Yu. Boiko // Vybrane. Miunkhen,
1974. – T. 2. – C. 249–267.
4. Boiko Yu. Do problemy rozvytku Frankovoho styliu / Yu. Boiko // Vybrani
tvory. – K. : Medekol, 1992. – S. 94–109.
5. Boiko Yu. Do problemy Frankovoho romantyzmu / Yu Boiko // Vybrane.
– Miunkhen, 1971. – T. 1. – S. 75–81.
6. Diuryshyn D. Teoryia sravnytelnoho yzuchenyia lyteratury / D. Diuryshyn. – M. :
Prohress, 1979. – 320 s.
7. Zerov M. Nove ukrainske pysmenstvo. Ukrainske pysmenstvo / M. Zerov – K. :
Osnovy, 2003. – S. 6–105.
8. Kachurovskyi I. Pokirna pravdi i krasi (Lesia Ukrainka ta yii tvorchist)
/ І.Kachurovskyi // Promenysti sylvety: lektsii, dopovidi, statti, esei, rozvidky. – K. :
Vyd. dim "Kyievo-Mohylian. Akad.", 2008. – S. 53–88.
9. Tvorchist Lesi Ukrainky: natsionalno-kulturni kody i yevropeiska tradytsiia
[Elektronnyi resurs] : мizhnar. nauk. кonf. (24–25 lut. 2021 r. // Slovo i chas. – 2021.
– № 3 (717). – S. 117. – Rezhym dostupu: https://il-journal.com/index.php/journal/
issue/view/209/3_2021_pdf.
10. Nalyvaiko D. Styl poezii Shevchenka i yoho mizhnatsionalnyi kontekst.
Komparatyvistyka y istoriia literatury / D. Nalyvaiko. – K. : Akta, 2007. – S. 235–273.
11. Narivska V. Suchasna frantsuzka komparatyvistyka: problemy metody
/ V. Narivska, N. Pakhsarian // Slovo i chas. – 2020. – № 3. – S. 48–64.
12. Petrov V. Ukrainska literature / V. Petrov, D. Chyzhevskyi, M. Hlobenko
// Ukrainska literatura. Mirchuk I. Istoriia ukrainskoi kultury. – Miunkhen ; Lviv,
1994. – S. 6–242.
13. Purpus I. Imaholohichnyi metod [Elektronnyi resurs] / І. Purpus //Metodolohii
suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zb. nauk. рr. vid. komparatyvistyky In-tu
literatury im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red. H. Syvachenko. – K., 2020. – S. 59–
106. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/k2/ attachments/metodologi
i _17.02.2021.pdf.
14. Riazantseva T. Intermedialnist yak metodolohiia literaturnoi komparatyvistyky.
[Elektronnyi resurs] / Т. Riazantseva // Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi
komparatyvistyky : zbirka nauk. рr. viddilu komparatyvistyky In-tu l-ry
182
im. T. H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red. H. Syvachenko. K., 2020. – S. 233–257.
– Rezhym dostupu: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/k2/attachments/ metodologii_
17.02.2021.pdf.
15. Sverbilova T. Mizhdystsyplinarnyi aspekt aktualnykh kontseptiv suchasnoi
postkolonialnoi teorii v dyskursi Comparative Culture [Elektronnyi resurs]
/ Т. Sverbilova // Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zb. nauk. рr.
vid.komparatyvistyky In-tu l-ry im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red.
H. Syvachenko. – Kyiv, 2020. – S. 408–428. – Rezhym dostupu:
http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/k2/attachments/ metodologii_ 17.02.2021.pdf.
16. Syvachenko H. Kulturnyi transfer – nova metodolohiia komparatyvistyky.
[Elektronnyi resurs] / Н. Syvachenko // Slovo i chas. – 2019. – № 3. – S. 71–81.
– Rezhym dostupu: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/
170789/08-Syvachenko.pdf? equence=1.
17. Skoryna L. Teoriia intertekstualnosti: vytoky, zdobutky, problemy. [Elektronnyi
resurs] / L. Skoryna // Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zb.
nauk.pr. vid. komparatyvistyky In-tu l-ry im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red.
H. Syvachenko. – K.,2020. – S. 125–159. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua
/media/k2/attachments/metodologii_17.02.2021.pdf.
18. Teterina O. Komparatyvistska model I. Kachurovskoho: mizh henetykokontaktolohiieiu i typolohiiei. [Elektronnyi resurs] / О. Teterina // Science and
Education a New Dimension. Philology – 2020. – VIII (70). – Issue 235. – Sept. S. 44–48.
– Rezhym dostupu: http://seanewdim.com/ploads/3/4/5/1/34511564/uhttpsdoi.
org10.31174send-ph2020-235viii70-11.pdf.
19. Teterina O. Ukrainskyi romantyzm u yevropeiskomu literaturnomu konteksti:
pohliady Yu. Boika-Blokhyna na problemu styliu [Elektronnyi resurs] / О. Teterina.
– 2020. – VIII (70). – Issue 189. – Feb. – S. 59–68. – Rezhym dostupu:
https://seanewdim.com/uploads/3/4/5/1/34511564/httpsdoi.org10.31174send-ph2019-
189vii55-14.pdf.
20. Teterina O. Fenomen ukrainskoi emihratsiinoi komparatyvistyky: diapazon
rukhu, poshukovi oriientyry, yevropeiskyi kontekst / О. Teterina [Elektronnyi resurs:
dys. na zdobuttia stupenia d-ra filol. nauk. – K., 2021. – 462 s. – Rezhym dostupu:
http://scc.univ.kiev.ua/upload/iblock/87f/dis_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%
D1%80%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%9E.%D0%91.pdf.
21. Boyko-Blochyn J. Die Stilrecherchen Lesja Ukrainkas auf dem Hintergrund der
Weltliteratur / J Boyko-Blochyn // Lesja Ukrainka und die europäische Literature.
– Köln ; Weimar ; Wien : Böhlau Verlag, 1994. – S. 11–32.
22. Bojko-Blochyn J. Lesja Ukrajinka und die eurohaische Literatur / J. BojkoBlochyn. – Köln ; Weimar ; Wien : Böhlau Verlag, 1994.
23. Teterina O. Ukrainian Versions of Classic Plots and Characters: Anent the Question
of the European Canon / O. Teterina // Technology transfer: innovative solutions in
Social Sciences and Humanities (Proceedings of the 2-nd Annual Conference.
28 March. 2019. – Tallinn, Estonia). – P. 30–33.