LESYA UKRAINKA’S CREATIVE WRITING IN RECEPTION OF RESEARCHERS COMPARATIVISTS OF UKRAINIAN EXPATRIATE COMMUNITY OF 30’S-80’S OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Volume 61 (2021)

O. В. Teterina
Doctor of Letters, senior research associate at Taras Shevchenko Institute of Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Summary

The article analyses the views of emigre scholars (J. Bojko-Blochyn M. Hlobenko, I. Kaczurowskyj,) of the specified period on the oeuvre of Lesya Ukrainka in its interconnections with world literature. The results of comparative analysis of works of the woman writer and the best representatives of European literature, from the perspective of her searches for style, allowed the scholars to acknowledge clear tendencies of modernism in national literature of the early 20th century, with emphasis on its specifics, and to introduce artistic heritage of the authoress of “The Stone Host” as a deeply original artistic phenomenon of the world culture. Fundamental importance of the researchers’ publications dedicated to the study of Lesya Ukrainka’s creative work – phenomenon of interpenetration of the national and the universal, Own and Alien – in shaping of Ukrainian literature as an organic component of the European cultural universe is emphasized.

The conclusion about multi-vector comprehension of the writer’s heritage in comparative models of the researchers (with the focus on the problems of typology and contact and genetic affinity, as well as involvement of interdisciplinary, intermedial, contextual and other approaches) is substantiated, and it demonstrates convincingly functional features of methodological tools of comparative literature in the study of national literature in general. It is proved that concepts of the emigre literary critics, who actually ensured continuous development of Ukrainian comparative studies, remain relevant to this day.

Key words: comparative studies, national literature, style, typology, contact and genetic affinity, reception, national specifics, European context.

Files to Download

Download

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6346.2(61).165-183

References

1. Boiko Yu. Estetychni pohliady Lesi Ukrainky ta yii stylovi shukannia. Vybrane. Miunkhen, 1981. T. 3. S. 241–286. 2. Boiko Yu. "Kaminnyi hospodar" Lesi Ukrainky. Vybrane. Miunkhen, 1981. T. 3. S. 327–362 (S. 345). 3. Boiko Yu. Ukrainskyi romantyzm Tsentralnoi i Skhidnoi Ukrainy u yoho stosunku do zakhidnoievropeiskoi romantyky. Vybrane. Miunkhen, 1974. T. 2. C. 249–267. 4. Boiko Yu. Do problemy rozvytku Frankovoho styliu. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv : Medekol, 1992. S. 94–109. 5. Boiko Yu. Do problemy Frankovoho romantyzmu. Vybrane. Miunkhen, 1971. T. 1. S. 75–81. 6. Diuryshyn D. Teoryia sravnytelnoho yzuchenyia lyteratury. Moskva: Prohress, 1979. 320 s. 7. Zerov M. Nove ukrainske pysmenstvo. Ukrainske pysmenstvo. Kyiv : Osnovy, 2003. S. 6–105. 8. Kachurovskyi I. Pokirna pravdi i krasi (Lesia Ukrainka ta yii tvorchist). Promenysti sylvety: lektsii, dopovidi, statti, esei, rozvidky. Kyiv : Vyd. dim "KyievoMohylianska akademiia", 2008. S. 53–88. 9. Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia "Tvorchist Lesi Ukrainky: natsionalnokulturni kody i yevropeiska tradytsiia". Slovo i chas. 2021. № 3 (717). S. 117. URL: https://il-journal.com/index.php/journal/issue/view/209/3_2021_pdf. 10. Nalyvaiko D. Styl poezii Shevchenka i yoho mizhnatsionalnyi kontekst. Komparatyvistyka y istoriia literatury. Kyiv : Akta, 2007. S. 235–273. 11. Narivska V., Pakhsarian N. Suchasna frantsuzka komparatyvistyka: problemy y metody. Slovo i chas. 2020. № 3. S. 48–64. 12. Petrov V., Chyzhevskyi D., Hlobenko M. Ukrainska literature / Petrov V., Chyzhevskyi D., Hlobenko M. Ukrainska literatura. Mirchuk I. Istoriia ukrainskoi kultury. Miunkhen ; Lviv, 1994.S. 6–242. 13. Petrov V., Chyzhevskyi D., Hlobenko M. Ukrainska literatura. Mirchuk I. Istoriia ukrainskoi kultury. Miunkhen ; Lviv, 1994. 374 s. 14. Purpus I. Imaholohichnyi metod. Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zbirka naukovykh prats viddilu komparatyvistyky Instytutu literatury im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red. H. Syvachenko. Kyiv, 2020. S. 59–106. URL: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/k2/attachments/metodologii_17.02.2021.pdf. 15. Riazantseva T. Intermedialnist yak metodolohiia literaturnoi komparatyvistyky. Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zbirka naukovykh prats viddilu komparatyvistyky Instytutu literatury im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red. H. Syvachenko. Kyiv, 2020. S. 233–257. URL: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/k2 /attachments/ metodologii_17.02.2021.pdf. 16. Sverbilova T. Mizhdystsyplinarnyi aspekt aktualnykh kontseptiv suchasnoi postkolonialnoi teorii v dyskursi Comparative Culture. Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zbirka naukovykh prats viddilu komparatyvistyky Instytutu literatury im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red. H. Syvachenko. Kyiv, 2020. S. 408–428. URL: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/k2/attachments/ metodologii_ 17.02.2021.pdf. 17. Syvachenko H. Kulturnyi transfer – nova metodolohiia komparatyvistyky. Slovo i chas. 2019. № 3. S. 71–81. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/ bitstream/ handle/ 123456789/170789/08-Syvachenko.pdf? equence=1. 18. Skoryna L. Teoriia intertekstualnosti: vytoky, zdobutky, problemy. Metodolohii suchasnoi literaturnoi komparatyvistyky : zbirka naukovykh prats viddilu komparatyvistyky Instytutu literatury im. T.H. Shevchenka NAN Ukrainy / red. H. Syvachenko. Kyiv, 2020. S. 125–159. URL: http://www.ilnan.gov.ua/media/ k2/attachments/metodologii_17.02.2021.pdf. 19. Teterina O. Komparatyvistska model I. Kachurovskoho: mizh henetykokontaktolohiieiu i typolohiieiu. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, VIII (70). Issue 235. 2020. Sept. S. 44–48. URL: http://seanewdim.com/ uploads/3/4/5/1/34511564/httpsdoi.org10.31174send-ph2020-235viii70-11.pdf. 20. Teterina O. Ukrainskyi romantyzm u yevropeiskomu literaturnomu konteksti: pohliady Yu. Boika-Blokhyna na problemu styliu. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology VII (55). Issue 189. 2019. Feb. S. 59–68. URL: https://seanewdim.com /uploads/3/4/5/1/34511564/httpsdoi.org10.31174send-ph2019- 189vii55-14.pdf. 21. Teterina O. Fenomen ukrainskoi emihratsiinoi komparatyvistyky: diapazon rukhu, poshukovi oriientyry, yevropeiskyi kontekst. Dysertatsiia na zdobuttia stupenia doktora filolohichnykh nauk. Kyiv, 2021. 462 s. URL: http://scc.univ.kiev.ua /upload/iblock/87f/dis_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%96% D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%9E.%D0%91.pdf. 22. Boyko-Blochyn J. Die Stilrecherchen Lesja Ukrainkas auf dem Hintergrund der Weltliteratur. Lesja Ukrainka und die europäische Literature. Köln ; Weimar ; Wien : Böhlau Verlag, 1994. S. 11–32. 23. Bojko-Blochyn J. Lesja Ukrajinka und die eurohaische Literatur. Köln ; Weimar ; Wien : Böhlau Verlag, 1994. 24. Teterina O. UKRAINIAN VERSIONS OF CLASSIC PLOTS AND CHARACTERS: ANENT THE QUESTION OF THE EUROPEAN CANON / Technology transfer: innovative solutions in Social Sciences and Humanities (Proceedings of the 2-nd Annual Conference. 28 March. 2019. Tallinn. Estonia). P. 30–33.