ROMANTICISM OF THE FOREST UKRAINE
IN THE ASSESSMENT OF D. CHYZHEVSKY

Volume 61-2 (2021)

N. M. Gaevska, PhD, Рrof., O. V. Naumovska, Dr Hab, Associate Prof.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv

Summary

The article focuses on D. Chyzhevsky’s assessment of Lesya Ukrainka’s
romanticism, outlines the latest trends in the literature of the late XIX – early
XX centuries, which professed Lesya Ukrainka as a neo-romantic. The aesthetics
of romanticism and its transformation into neo-romanticism are traced. It is about
identifying and analyzing the symbolism of Lesya Ukrainka’s works. The subject
matter of the poet’s works is considered, the influence of romantic ideas (German,
Polish romanticism) at the end of the XIX century is comprehended; combination
of theoretical views of the writer with works of art, which is characteristic
of romantic writers.
Keywords: romanticism, literary process, symbolism, theater, tendencies,
conventionality.

Files to Download

Download

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6346.2(61).20-27

References

1. Zerov M. Lesja Ukrajinka / M. Zerov // Tvory : u 2 t. – K., 1990. – T. 2. – S. 396. 2. Istorija ukrajinskoji literatury kin. XIX – poč. XX st. : u 2 kn. / za red. O. D. Hnidan. – K., 2005. – Kn. 1 – S. 190. 3. Ukrajinka Lesja. Zibrannja tvoriv: u 12 t. / Lesja Ukrajinka. – K., 1979. – T. 3. – S. 261–262). 4. Masenko L. U Vavilonskomu poloni: tema nacionalnoji ta socialnoji nevoli v dramaturhiji Lesi Ukrajinky / L. Masenko // Ukrajinska mova ta literatura. – K., 2000. – S. 8. 5. Melnyčuk B. M. Dramatyčna poema jak žanr / B. Melnyčuk. – K., 1981. – S. 88–89. 6. Najenko M. Peredmova / M. Najenko // D. Čyževskyj. Realizm v ukrajinskij literaturi. – K., 1999. 7. Odarčenko P. "Dvi heneraciji tvorčosti Lesi Ukrajinky" (Lesja Ukrajinka) / P. Odarčenko. – K., 1994. – S. 160. 8. Franko I. . Zibrannja tvoriv: u 50 t. / І. Franko. – K., 1981. – T. 31. – S. 264. 9. Šumylo N. Ukrajinska proza kincja XIX – počatku XX st.: Problema nacionalnoji imanentnosti / N. Šumylo : аvtoref. dys…d-r filol. nauk. – K., 2004. – S. 1.