THEATER OF CORYPHAEUS AND “BEREZIL” THEATER IN THE WORKS OF LITERARY CRITICS OF THE UKRAINIAN DIASPORA

Volume 60 (2021)

S. I. Lushchii
Dr Hab., Senior Research, Taras Shevchenko Institute of Literature of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Summary

The article considers the issue of reception of creativity of the theater of coryphaeus and the theater “Berezil” in the literary studies of the Ukrainian diaspora in the second half of the twentieth century. The material for the research was articles and radio broadcasts by Yu. Lavrinenko, literary explorations by Yu. Sherekh and M. Pavlyshyn. The study also deals with emigrant productions of plays performed by the “Berezil” Theater in Soviet Ukraine, and directorial interpretations of Shakespeare’s plays by P. Saksagansky. The article explains why diaspora researchers paid more attention to the Berezil Theater than to the Coryphaeus Theater. Lavrinenko’s radio programs dedicated to outstanding figures of theatrical art are analyzed. The plays of coryphaeus playwrights directed by the diaspora are considered. Information on the productions of the Les Kurbas Theater (Australia) by I. Karpenko-Kary, M. Starytsky, M. Kropyvnytsky is provided. Yu. Lavrinenko and Yu. Sherekh were well acquainted with the performances of the Berezil Theater. Therefore, the article presents their memories about Les Kurbas. A new re-reading of M. Starytsky’s works by directors of the diaspora is considered. The reasons for the popularity of the works of classic playwrights among the audience of the diaspora are found out. In articles and radio programs Yu. Lavrinenko, Yu. Sherekh and M. Pavlyshyn added unknown touches that helped to present outstanding figures of dramatic art more vividly, colorfully and more fully. Memories and unknown archival sources are used in the work.

Keywords: theater of coryphaeus, theater “Berezil”, reception, diaspora, national identity, modernism.

Files to Download

Download

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6346.60.102-112

References

1. Blavatskyi V. Moia pratsia z Lesem Kurbasom. MUR. Zbirnyky literaturnomystetskoi problematyky. Zbirnyk I. Miunkhen-Karlsfeld, 1946. C. 90–95. 2. Dyvnych Iu. 25-richchia teatru Lesia Kurbasa "Berezil". Litavry. 1947. Ch. 2. S. 59–60. 3. Kulish M. Narodnii Malakhii: Trahediine. Filiadelfiia: Kyiv, 1952. 67 s. 4. Lavrinenko Iu. Zrub i parosty: Literaturno-krytychni statti, esei, refleksii. [Miunkhen]: Suchasnist, 1971. 334 s. 5. Lavrinenko Iu. Literaturnyi svit: peredachi na radio "Svoboda" z 12.XI.1959 po 01.III.1966. Kyiv: Tvim inter, 2013. 784 s. 6. Lavrinenko Iu. Na ostannii vystavi "Berezolia" – "Maklena Grasa". Lavrinenko Iu. Chorna purha ta inshi spomyny. [Miunkhen]: Suchasnist 1985. 194 s. 7. Lavrinenko Iu. Shche odna knyzhka materiialiv z arkhivu Arkadiia Liubchenka. Lysty do pryiateliv. 1963. Knyha 11–12. S. 46–48. 8. Les Kurbas: spohady suchasnykiv / Za red. V. S. Vasylka. Uporiad. M. H. Labinskyi. Kyiv: Mystetstvo, 1969. 359 s. 9. Les Kurbas: Staty y vospomynanyia o Lese Kurbase. Lyteraturnoe nasledye / Sost. M. H. Labynskyi, L. S. Taniuk. Moskva: Yskusstvo, 1988. 463 s. 10. Lyst O. Burevii do Yu. Lavrinenka vid 20 chervnia 1946 roku. IL. F. 215. Od. zb. 83. Ark. 1. 11. Lyst O. Burevii do Yu. Lavrinenka vid 24 zhovtnia 1947 roku. IL. F. 215. Od. zb. 83. Ark. 8. 12. Lyst Yu. Lavrinenka do U. Samchuka vid 3 liutoho 1955 roku. IL. F. 195. Od. zb. 1212. Ark. 11. 13. Makaryk I. Peretvorennia Shekspira: Les Kurbas, ukrainskyi modernizm i radianska kulturna polityka 20-kh rokiv. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 2010. 348 s. 14. Pavlyshyn M. Kultura ta emihrantska samosvidomist: ukrainskyi teatr v Avstralii v 1949–1989 rokakh. Pavlyshyn M. Kanon ta ikonostas: Literaturnokrytychni statti. Kyiv: Chas, 1997. 447 s. 15. Sherekh Iu. Z povisty pro dvokh Yurkiv. Sherekh Iu. Tretia storozha. Literatura. Mystetstvo. Ideolohii. Baltymor–Toronto: Ukrainske nezalezhne vydavnytstvo "Smoloskyp" im. V. Symonenka, 1991. S. 436–437. 16. Sherekh Iu. Druhe narodzhennia "Narodnoho Malakhiia". Sherekh Iu. Porohy i zaporizhzhia. Literatura. Mystetstvo. Ideolohii. Kharkiv: Folio, 1998. T. 1. S. 424–433.