The artistic interpretation of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the understanding of the Pereiaslav agreement in the works of Mykhailo Starytskyi (based on his prose, dramaturgy, and poetry)

Authors

  • Yaroslava VILNA DSc (Philol.), Prof. ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1026-5198 e-mail: ia.vilna@ukr.net , Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6346.2(69).34-51

Keywords:

romantic-historical prose, dramaturgy, poetry, artistic interpretation, political history, national self-awareness

Abstract

The article analyzes Mykhailo Starytskyi's artistic interpretation of the Pereiaslav Agreement of 1654 as a political act in Ukrainian history. The study is based on three of his works: the historical-romantic trilogy "Bohdan Khmelnytskyi", the verse drama "Bohdan Khmelnytskyi", and the ballad "The Epiphany Night". Particular attention is paid to the realization of artistic traditions of European and national literatures, as well as folklore, as reflected in the author's treatment of themes, problems, and imagery in works written on historical material.

The research takes into account the circumstances and constraints - primarily censorship pressure - that forced the author, in the process of artistically interpreting the tactics and strategy of Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytskyi in his struggle against Ukraine's enemies in the seventeenth century, to adhere to the viewpoints of imperial historiography regarding the period of the Khmelnytskyi Uprising and its final event, the Pereiaslav Council. It is emphasized that despite these limitations, Starytskyi, as a representative of the nationally conscious Ukrainian intelligentsia and a talented artist, succeeded in convincing readers that there should be no place for skepticism or disillusionment, since Ukrainian history of this period is marked not only by defeats resulting from the betrayal of allies, such as at Berestechko, but also by great victories and achievements. These were the outcome not of situational resistance, but of the national experience of a heroic, long-lasting, and exhausting struggle for freedom over the centuries.

The article also argues for the logical evolution of this theme - previously artistically explored by the author - of the Ukrainian struggle for their rights, and examines the critical interpretation of the consequences of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi's political choice as presented in the ballad "The Epiphany Night".

References

Franko, I. (1982). Mykhailo Petrovych Starytskyi. In: Collected Works in 50 vols. Vol. 33. Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Kostomarov, M. (1994). Materials and Research. Bohdan Khmelnytskyi. Charli [in Ukrainian].

Levchyk, P. (1990). The Poetry of M. P. Starytskyi (Genre and Stylistic Features). Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Plokhy, S. (2025). The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine from the Scythian Wars to Independence. KSD [in Ukrainian].

Polishchuk, V. (2003). The Novellas of Mykhailo Starytskyi. Brama [in Ukrainian]. Starytska-Cherniakhivska, L. (2000). Selected Works. Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian]. Starytskyi, M. (1990). Works: in 6 volumes. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].

Starytskyi, M. (1963). Hetman. In Starytskyi M. Works: in 8 vol. (vol. 1, pp. 168-170). State Publishing House of Fiction [in Ukrainian].

Starytskyi, M. (1984). Works: in two volumes. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].

Vilna, Ya. & Khvorostianyi, I. (2017). History of Ukrainian Literature of the

Second Half of the 19th Century (pp. 425-446). Kyiv University Press [in Ukrainian].

Yefremov, S. (1995). History of Ukrainian Literature. Femina [in Ukrainian].

Zabuzhko, O. (2025). Our Europe. Komora [in Ukrainian].

Zerov, M. (2003). The Literary Position of Starytskyi. In: Ukrainian Literature. Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Zhulynsky M. H. (Ed.). (1999). History of Ukrainian Literature of the 1870s-1890s. in 2 vol. Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

VILNA, Y. (2026). The artistic interpretation of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the understanding of the Pereiaslav agreement in the works of Mykhailo Starytskyi (based on his prose, dramaturgy, and poetry). Literary Studies, 2(69), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6346.2(69).34-51